4.7 Article

AEVE 3D: Acousto Electrodynamic Three-Dimensional Vibration Exciter for Engineering Testing

期刊

IEEE-ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS
卷 23, 期 4, 页码 1897-1906

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMECH.2018.2841011

关键词

Acoustic testing; energy harvester; mechanical vibration; piezoelectric devices; test equipment

资金

  1. University of South Carolina

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A high percentage of failures in sensors and devices employed in harsh industrial environments and airborne electronics is due to mechanical vibrations and shocks. Therefore, it is of paramount importance to test equipment reliability and ensure its survival in long missions in the presence of physical fluctuations. Traditional vibration testbeds employ unidirectional acoustic or mechanical excitations. However, in reality, equipment may encounter uncoupled (unidirectional) and/or coupled (multidirectional) loading conditions during operation. Hence, to systematically characterize and fully understand equipment's behavior, a testbed capable of simulating a wide variety of vibration conditions is required. The primary objective of this study is design, fabrication, and testing of an acousto electrodynamic three-dimensional (3-D) vibration exciter (AEVE 3-D), which simulates coupled and decoupled (with unpowered arms) 3-D acoustic and/or 3-D mechanical vibration environments. AEVE 3-D consists of three electromagnetic shakers (for mechanical excitation) and three loud speakers (for acoustic excitation) as well as a main control unit that accurately calculates and sets the actuators' input signals in order to generate optimal coupled and decoupled vibrations at desired frequencies. In this paper, the system's architecture, its mechanical structure, and electrical components are described. In addition, to verify AEVE 3-D's performance, various experiments are carried out using a 3-D piezoelectric energy harvester and a custom-made piezoelectric beam.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据