4.5 Article

Analysis of Millimeter-Wave Multi-Hop Networks With Full-Duplex Buffered Relays

期刊

IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORKING
卷 26, 期 1, 页码 576-590

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TNET.2017.2786341

关键词

Millimeter-wave; multi-hop; moment generating functions; delay; backlog

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61371105]
  2. National 973 Programs [2013CB329001]
  3. EU Marie Curie Project, QUICK [612652]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The abundance of spectrum in the millimeter-wave (mm-wave) bands makes it an attractive alternative for future wireless communication systems. Such systems are expected to provide data transmission rates in the order of multi-gigabits per second in order to satisfy the ever-increasing demand for high rate data communication. Unfortunately, mm-wave radio is subject to severe path loss, which limits its usability for long-range outdoor communication. In this paper, we propose a multi-hop mm-wave wireless network for outdoor communication, where multiple full-duplex buffered relays are used to extend the communication range, while providing end-to-end performance guarantees to the traffic traversing the network. We provide a cumulative service process characterization for the mm-wave propagation channel with self-interference in terms of the moment generating function of its channel capacity. Then, we then use this characterization to compute probabilistic upper bounds on the overall network performance, i.e., total backlog and end-to-end delay. Furthermore, we study the effect of self-interference on the network performance and propose an optimal power allocation scheme to mitigate its impact in order to enhance network performance. Finally, we investigate the relation between relay density and network performance under a sum power constraint. We show that increasing relay density may have adverse effects on network performance, unless the selfinterference can be kept sufficiently small.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据