4.7 Article

LEARN TO CACHE: MACHINE LEARNING FOR NETWORK EDGE CACHING IN THE BIG DATA ERA

期刊

IEEE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 28-35

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/MWC.2018.1700317

关键词

-

资金

  1. Academy of Finland [284748]
  2. National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61601181]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2017MS13]
  4. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [4174104]
  5. Beijing Outstanding Young Talent [2016000020124G081]
  6. Luxembourg National Research Fund (FNR) CORE project ROSETTA [11632107]
  7. European Research Council (ERC) project AGNOSTIC [742648]
  8. NSF [DMS-1736470, CNS-1702957]
  9. Wireless Engineering Research and Education Center (WEREC) at Auburn University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The unprecedented growth of wireless data traffic not only challenges the design and evolution of the wireless network architecture, but also brings about profound opportunities to drive and improve future networks. Meanwhile, the evolution of communications and computing technologies can make the network edge, such as BSs or UEs, become intelligent and rich in terms of computing and communications capabilities, which intuitively enables big data analytics at the network edge. In this article, we propose to explore big data analytics to advance edge caching capability, which is considered as a promising approach to improve network efficiency and alleviate the high demand for the radio resource in future networks. The learning-based approaches for network edge caching are discussed, where a vast amount of data can be harnessed for content popularity estimation and proactive caching strategy design. An outlook of research directions, challenges, and opportunities is provided and discussed in depth. To validate the proposed solution, a case study and a performance evaluation are presented. Numerical studies show that several gains are achieved by employing learning-based schemes for edge caching.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据