4.7 Article

Hybrid Time-Switching and Power Splitting SWIPT for Full-Duplex Massive MIMO Systems: A Beam-Domain Approach

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY
卷 67, 期 8, 页码 7257-7274

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2018.2831790

关键词

Full duplex massive MIMO; beam-domain channel representation; simultaneous wireless information and power transfer; beamforming; achievable sum rate

资金

  1. Jiangsu Province Natural Science Foundation [BK20160079]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61671472]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we consider the hybrid time switching (TS) and power splitting (PS) simultaneous wireless information and power transfer (SWIPT) protocol design in a full-duplex (FD) massive MIMO system. In this system, an FD base station (BS) serves a set of half-duplex (HD) users and a set of fixed HD sensors. The whole protocol can be divided into two phases based on the idea of TS. The first phase is Training Phase, which is designed for users uplink training and sensors energy harvesting as well as downlink training. Specifically, users transmit uplink pilots for beam-domain (BD) uplink channel estimation at the BS, and the BS transmits energy signals to sensors. Based on the idea of PS, sensors utilize the received energy signals for energy harvesting and BD downlink channel estimation. In the second phase, that is Information Transmission Phase, the BS intelligently schedules users and sensors based on the BD distributions of channels to mitigate self-interference and improve transmission spectral efficiency (SE). Then, the BS forms transmit beamformers for transmitting information to users and receive beamformers for receiving signals transmitted by sensors. By optimizing transmit powers at the BS during the two phases and the TS ratio, the system achievable sum-rate is maximized. Simulation results show the superiority of the proposed protocol on SE compared with conventional massive MIMO SWIPT protocol.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据