4.7 Article

Provision for Guaranteed Inertial Response in Diesel-Wind Systems via Model Reference Control

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS
卷 33, 期 6, 页码 6557-6568

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2827205

关键词

Inertia emulation; low-inertia microgrid; diesel-wind system; model reference control; polytopic uncertainty

资金

  1. Engineering Research Center Program of the National Science Foundation
  2. Department of Energy under NSF Award [EEC-1041877]
  3. Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program of Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC05-00OR22725]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Frequency performance has been a crucial issue for islanded microgrids. On the one hand, mast distributed energy resources are converter-interfaced and do not inherently respond to frequency variations. On the other hand, current inertia emulation approach cannot provide guaranteed response. In this paper, a model reference control based inertia emulation strategy is proposed for diesel-wind systems. Desired inertia can he precisely emulated through the proposed strategy. A typical frequency response model with parametric inertia is set to be the reference model. A measurement at a specific location delivers the information about the disturbance acting on the diesel-wind system to the reference model. The objective is for the speed of the diesel generator to track the reference so that the desired inertial response is realized. In addition, polytopic parameter uncertainty will be considered. The control strategy is configured in different ways according to different operating points. The parameters of the reference model are scheduled to ensure adequate frequency response under a pre-defined worst case. The controller is implemented in a nonlinear three-phase diesel-wind system fed microgrid using the Simulink software platform. The results show that exact synthetic inertia can be emulated and adequate frequency response is achieved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据