4.7 Article

Performance Bounds on Spatial Coverage Tasks by Stochastic Robotic Swarms

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL
卷 63, 期 6, 页码 1563-1578

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TAC.2017.2747769

关键词

Advection-diffusion-reaction (ADR) partial differential equation (PDE); optimal control; stochastic systems; swarm robotics

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CMMI-1435709, CMMI-1436960]
  2. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  3. Directorate For Engineering [1436960] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  5. Directorate For Engineering [1435709] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a novel procedure for computing parameters of a robotic swarm that guarantee coverage performance by the swarm within a specified error from a target spatial distribution. The main contribution of this paper is the analysis of the dependence of this error on two key parameters: the number of robots in the swarm and the robot sensing radius. The robots cannot localize or communicate with one another, and they exhibit stochasticity in their motion and task-switching policies. We model the population dynamics of the swarm as an advectiondiffusion- reaction partial differential equation (PDE) with time-dependent advection and reaction terms. We derive rigorous bounds on the discrepancies between the target distribution and the coverage achieved by individual-based and PDE models of the swarm. We use these bounds to select the swarm size that will achieve coverage performance within a given error and the corresponding robot sensing radius that will minimize this error. We also apply the optimal control approach from our prior work in [13] to compute the robots' velocity field and task-switching rates. We validate our procedure through simulations of a scenario, in which a robotic swarm must achieve a specified density of pollination activity over a crop field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据