4.2 Article

A tale of two clades: Comparative study of Glyptodon Owen and Glyptotherium Osborn (Xenarthra, Cingulata, Glyptodontidae)

期刊

GEOBIOS
卷 51, 期 3, 页码 247-258

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geobios.2018.04.004

关键词

Diversity; Glyptodonts; Conservative evolution; Morphology; America; Great American Biotic Interchange (GABI)

资金

  1. Arizona Museum of Natural History and Museum of Northern Arizona
  2. CONICET [PIP 0150]
  3. SGCyT-UNNE [PI Q001/13]
  4. UNLP [N-724]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glyptodon and Glyptotherium represent the most conspicuous taxa of late Neogene and Pleistocene glyptodonts in South America and North America, respectively. The earliest records of Glyptodon in South America are 1.07 Ma (late early Pleistocene, Calabrian), although the possibility that Paraglyptodon uquiensis represents a Pliocene specimen of Glyptodon cannot be rejected. Glyptotherium originated from South American ancestry in northern South America or Central America about 3.9 Ma (early late Pliocene, Zanclean) or earlier. The diversity of South American Glyptodon is currently under study, but preliminary evidence would indicate that no more than three species (G. munizi, G. elongatus and G. reticulatus) are valid, plus a possible new Andean species. In turn, according to the updated taxonomy proposed herein, Glyptotherium includes two chronospecies. The earliest species, Gl. texanum, differs only slightly from the latest species, Gl. cylindricum. The relationship of Glyptodon and Glyptotherium has been problematical since the discovery of the North American lineage, at first identified as various species of Glyptodon and later considered a separate genus. Glyptodon is recognized as a natural group and recent taxonomic and phylogenetic revisions place all North American glyptodontines into Glyptotherium. In this paper, we propose a detailed morphological comparison between the southern South American species of Glyptodon and Glyptotherium in order to identify diagnostic differences and potential synapomorphies. Both genera can be distinguished mainly by differences in the skull, mandible, dentition, dorsal carapace, and caudal armor, Glyptodon being somewhat larger than Glyptotherium. Both clades show a highly conservative evolution, which could be interpreted as an anagenesis. The scarce records of glyptodonts in Central America show more morphological affinity with Glyptotherium than with Glyptodon. (C) 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据