4.5 Article

Wii Fit exer-game training improves sensory weighting and dynamic balance in healthy young adults

期刊

GAIT & POSTURE
卷 41, 期 2, 页码 711-715

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.01.030

关键词

Postural control; Vestibular function; Limits of stability; Balance intervention; Body sway

资金

  1. National Skeletal Muscle Research Center at the University of California, San Diego

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Nintendo Wii Fit is a balance training tool that is growing in popularity due to its ease of access and cost-effectiveness. While considerable evidence now exists demonstrating the efficacy of the Wii Fit, no study to date has determined the specific mechanism underlying Wii Fit balance improvement. This paucity of knowledge was addressed in the present study using the NeuroCom Balance Manager's Sensory Organization Test (SOT) and Limits of Stability (LOS) test. These well-recognized posturography assessments, respectively, measure sensory weighting and dynamic stability mechanisms of balance. Forty healthy, young participants were recruited into two groups: Wii Fit Balance Intervention (WFBI) (n = 20) and Control (CON) (n = 20). Balance training consisted of seven Wii Fit exer-games played over the course of six consecutive weeks (2-4x/week, 30-45 min/day). The WFBI group performed Neurocom testing before and after the intervention, while the CON group was tested along a similar timeline with no intervention. Mixed-design ANOVAs found significant interactions for testing time point and condition 5 of the SOT (p < 0.02), endpoint excursion (p < 0.01), movement velocity (p < 0.02), and response time (p < 0.01). These effects were such that greater improvements were seen for the WFBI group following Wii Fit training. These findings suggest that individuals with known issues regarding the processing of multiple sources of sensory information and/or who have limited functional bases of support may benefit most from Wii Fit balance training. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据