4.5 Article

The influence of below-knee compression garments on knee-joint proprioception

期刊

GAIT & POSTURE
卷 60, 期 -, 页码 258-261

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.08.008

关键词

Rehabilitation; Stability; Multitasking; Injury-prevention

资金

  1. Education New Zealand

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The purpose of the study was to assess the influence of below-knee compression garments on proprioception accuracy under, information processing constraints designed to cause high or low conscious attention to the task. Methods: In a counterbalanced, single-blinded, crossover trial, 44 healthy participants (26 male/18 female) with a mean age of 22.7 +/- 6.9 years performed an active joint repositioning task using their nondominant and their dominant leg, with and without below-knee compression and with and without conducting a secondary task. Results: Analysis of variance revealed no main effect of leg dominance and no interactions (p's > 0.05). However, a main effect was evident for both compression (F-1, (43) = 84.23, p < 0.001, eta p(2) = 0.665) and secondary task (F-1, (43) = 4.391, p = 0.04, eta p(2) = 0.093). Conclusions: The study is the first to evaluate the effects of a belowknee compression garment on knee proprioception under differential information processing constraints. We conclude that proprioception accuracy of the knee joint is significantly enhanced post application of below-knee compression garments and when a secondary task is conducted concurrently with active joint repositioning. The findings suggest that below-knee compression garments may improve proprioception of the knee, regardless of leg dominance, and that secondary tasks that direct attention away from proprioceptive judgments may also improve proprioception, regardless of the presence of compression. Clinical implications are discussed with respect to proprioception in modern. sports and rehabilitation settings. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据