4.7 Article

Experimental study of impact of anisotropy and heterogeneity on gas flow in coal. Part I: Diffusion and adsorption

期刊

FUEL
卷 232, 期 -, 页码 444-453

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.05.173

关键词

Bidisperse model; Langmuir model; Bowen Basin; Coalbed methane; CBM

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council
  2. CSIRO Energy
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2015XKZD03]
  4. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT_17R103]
  5. Overseas Expertise Introduction Project for Discipline Innovation (111 Project)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gas is adsorbed in the pores of coal matrix and during gas production gas is desorbed from the pore surface and diffuses through the matrix pore structure and flows in the fracture/cleat system to the production well or boreholes. However, coal is highly heterogeneous and anisotropic. How heterogeneity and anisotropy affect the gas storage and especially the diffusion behaviour is not well studied. In this work, a series of measurements were performed on three dry cubic coal samples cut from the same coal block from the Bowen Basin, Australia, using an adsorbing gas, methane. For each sample, gas adsorption experiments with gas flowing from three principal directions were performed. The diffusion data was fitted with a bidisperse diffusion model to obtain diffusion coefficient. The three samples, although from the same coal block, showed difference in adsorption amount and significant difference in effective diffusivity. It was found that the effective macropore diffusivity increased with gas pressure and effective micropore coefficient decreased with gas pressure. The effective diffusivity showed difference among samples and directions, demonstrating coal heterogeneity and anisotropy both have a significant impact on gas diffusion behaviour. However, no generalisation can be obtained with any single pore structure parameter, such as pore size or surface area, as it may be related to all pore and fracture structures at various scales.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据