Does a combined CT and MRI protocol enhance the diagnostic efficacy of LI-RADS in the categorization of hepatic observations? A prospective comparative study

To compare diagnostic performance and agreement between CT, MRI and combined CT/MRI in reference to LI-RADS classification system to categorize hepatic observations detected in hepatic patients during screening ultrasound. 240 patients with 296 liver observations detected during ultrasound surveillance underwent hepatic CT and MRI examinations, histopathology, and clinical and radiological follow-up. Using LI-RADS v2014, six radiologists evaluated the observations independently and assigned a LI-RADS category to each observation using CT, MRI and combined CT/MRI. Combined CT and MRI in LI-RADS yielded better accuracy (91.29 %), sensitivity (90.71 %) and specificity (92.31 %) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosis than using MRI or CT alone; accuracy, sensitivity and specificity decreased to 85.37 %, 86.34 %, and 83.65 %, respectively, for MRI and 67.6 %, 54.10 % and 91.35 %, respectively, for CT. The intraclass agreement of the LI-RADS scores between CT, MRI and combined CT/MRI was excellent (kappa=0.9624 (95 % CI: 0.9318-0.9806)). CT and MRI are complementary to each other. Combined CT/MRI enabled a more precise determination of LI-RADS category of hepatic observations; however, due to the expense and minor increase in accuracy, the combined methodology should only be utilized in cases of suspected HCC. aEuro cent Hepatic observation may be categorized differently depending on the imaging modality used. aEuro cent We compared LI-RADS categorization between CT, MRI and combined CT/MRI. aEuro cent MRI produces higher accuracy and sensitivity, while CT produces higher specificity. aEuro cent Combining CT and MRI improves LIRADS categorization reports. aEuro cent Considering additional cost, combined methodology could be restricted to challenging cases.