4.7 Article

Auto-selection mechanism of differential evolution algorithm variants and its application

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
卷 270, 期 2, 页码 636-653

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.10.013

关键词

Evolutionary computations; Differential evolution; Parameter estimation; Multi-algorithm selection

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61603244]
  2. Shanghai Science and Technology Commission [16PJ1403800]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Each type of problems, such as unimodal/multimodal, linear/non-linear, convex/non-convex, and symmetrical/asymmetrical, has its own characteristics. Although various differential evolution (DE) variants have been proposed, several studies indicate that a DE variant may only exhibit high solution efficiency in solving a specific type of problems, but may perform poorly in others. Therefore, an important decision is made to automatically select a suitable DE variant among several chosen algorithms for solving a particular type of problems during the evolutionary process. To achieve this objective, an auto-selection mechanism (ASM) is introduced in this study. In the ASM, rankings attained using Friedman's test are adopted to assess the performances of DE variants. A learning strategy is employed to update the choice probabilities of DE variants, and an additional selection probability is used to alleviate the greedy selection issue. Three sets of benchmark test functions proposed in BBOB2012, IEEE CEC2005, and IEEE CEC2014 are used to evaluate the effectiveness of the ASM. The performance of the proposed algorithm is also compared with that of nine state-of-the-art DE variants and four non-DE algorithms. Statistical analysis results demonstrate that the ASM is an efficient and effective method that can take full advantages of multiple algorithms. Furthermore, the ASM is utilized to estimate the parameters of a heavy oil thermal cracking model. Experimental results indicate that the proposed algorithm outperforms the other compared algorithms in this case. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据