4.7 Article

Diamine and PEGylated-diamine conjugates of triterpenic acids as potential anticancer agents

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 148, 期 -, 页码 325-336

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.02.044

关键词

Triterpene; Oleanolic acid; Maslinic acid; Diamine conjugate; Cytotoxicity; Apoptosis

资金

  1. Consejeria de Innovacion, Ciencia y Empresa of the Junta de Andalucia [P11-FQM-7372]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A set of 18 amide derivatives of oleanolic or maslinic acid has been semi-synthesised. Twelve were diamine conjugates at C-28 of these triterpenic acids and the other six were PEGylated-diamine derivatives. The cytotoxic effects of these 18 triterpenic derivatives in three cancer-cell lines (B16-F10, HT29, and Hep G2) have been assayed, and have been compared to three non-tumour cell lines of the same or a similar tissue (HPF, IEC-18, and WRL68). The cell viability percentages for the non-tumour HPF line for almost all diamine conjugates of the tested triterpenic acids ranged from 81% to 94%. The best cytotoxic results were achieved with the diamine conjugates of oleanolic or maslinic acid with the shortest and the longest diamine chain (IC50 values from 0.76 mu M to 1.76 mu M), on the B16-F10 cell line, being between 140- and 20-fold more effective than their corresponding precursors. Four diamine conjugates of these triterpenic acids showed apoptotic effects on treated cells of the B16-F10 line, with total apoptosis rates, relative to control, of between 73% and 90%. The DNA-histogram analysis revealed that all compounds tested produced cell-cycle arrest in B16-F10 cells, increasing the number of these cells in the S phase. All the compounds analysed, except one, did not cause changes in mitochondrial-membrane potential during apoptosis of the B16-F10 cancer cells, suggesting an activation of the extrinsic apoptotic pathway for these compounds. (C) 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据