4.5 Review Book Chapter

Mitochondrial DNA transcription and translation: clinical syndromes

期刊

MITOCHONDRIAL DISEASES
卷 62, 期 3, 页码 321-340

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/EBC20170103

关键词

-

资金

  1. MRC [MR/N025431/2, G1000848, MR/N025431/1, MR/N010035/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. European Research Council [309548] Funding Source: Medline
  3. Medical Research Council [G1000848, MR/N025431/1, MR/N025431/2, MR/N010035/1] Funding Source: Medline
  4. Wellcome Trust [203105/Z/16/Z, 201064/Z/16/Z, 109915/Z/15/Z] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diagnosing primary mitochondrial diseases is challenging in clinical practice. Although, defective oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) is the common final pathway, it is unknown why different mtDNA or nuclear mutations result in largely heterogeneous and often tissue -specific clinical presentations. Mitochondrial tRNA (mt-tRNA) mutations are frequent causes of mitochondrial diseases both in children and adults. However numerous nuclear mutations involved in mitochondrial protein synthesis affecting ubiquitously expressed genes have been reported in association with very tissue specific clinical manifestations suggesting that there are so far unknown factors determining the tissue specificity in mitochondrial translation. Most of these gene defects result in histological abnormalities and multiple respiratory chain defects in the affected organs. The clinical phenotypes are usually early-onset, severe, and often fatal, implying the importance of mitochondrial translation from birth. However, some rare, reversible infantile mitochondrial diseases are caused by very specific defects of mitochondrial translation. An unbiased genetic approach (whole exome sequencing, RNA sequencing) combined with proteomics and functional studies revealed novel factors involved in mitochondrial translation which contribute to the clinical manifestation and recovery in these rare reversible mitochondrial conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据