4.8 Article

Production Temperature Effects on the Structure of Hydrochar-Derived Dissolved Organic Matter and Associated Toxicity

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 52, 期 13, 页码 7486-7495

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b04983

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC0212205]
  2. National Key Technology Support Program [2015BAD15B06]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21577025]
  4. International Postdoctoral Exchange Fellowship Program of China
  5. Fudan University
  6. State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrochar is a carbonaceous material derived from hydro thermal liquefaction, and it carries good potential as a new material for environmental applications. However, little is known about the dissolved organic matter (DOM) associated with hydrochar and the consequences of its release. The relationship between the production temperature and the characteristics of DOM released from hydrochar as well as the associated biotoxicity was investigated using a suite of advanced molecular and spectroscopic tools. With the increase in production temperature, the resulted hydrochar-based DOM contained a higher content of phenols and organic acids but less sugars and furans. Meanwhile, the molecular structure of DOM shifted to lower molecular weight with higher organic contents containing <6 O atoms per cornpound, aromatics, and N-containing substances. While low-temperature hydrochar-derived DOM showed minimal biotoxicity, increase in production temperature to 330 degrees C led to a great rise in toxicity. This might be attributed to the increased contents of phenols, organic acids, and organics containing <6 O atoms and 1 N atom per compound. These results suggest that hydrochar-derived DOM have more negative impacts on the environment than the organics associated with biochar production. Such understanding highlights the importance of controlling the hydrochar production process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据