4.7 Article

Short term policies to keep the door open for Paris climate goals

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 13, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aac4f1

关键词

mitigation pathway; integrated assessment; regulatory policies; carbon pricing; political implementability; Paris Agreement; 1.5 degrees C and 2 degrees C temperature limits

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [01LS10A (PEP1p5)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Climate policy needs to account for political and social acceptance. Current national climate policy plans proposed under the Paris Agreement lead to higher emissions until 2030 than cost-effective pathways towards the Agreements' long-term temperature goals would imply. Therefore, the current plans would require highly disruptive changes, prohibitive transition speeds, and large long-term deployment of risky mitigation measures for achieving the agreement's temperature goals after 2030. Since the prospects of introducing the cost-effective policy instrument, a global comprehensive carbon price in the near-term, are negligible, we study how a strengthening of existing plans by a global roll-out of regional policies can ease the implementation challenge of reaching the Paris temperature goals. The regional policies comprise a bundle of regulatory policies in energy supply, transport, buildings, industry, and land use and moderate, regionally differentiated carbon pricing. We find that a global roll-out of these policies could reduce global CO2 emissions by an additional 10 GtCO(2)eq in 2030 compared to current plans. It would lead to emissions pathways close to the levels of cost-effective likely below 2 degrees C scenarios until 2030, thereby reducing implementation challenges post 2030. Even though a gradual phase-in of a portfolio of regulatory policies might be less disruptive than immediate cost-effective carbon pricing, it would perform worse in other dimensions. In particular, it leads to higher economic impacts that could become major obstacles in the long-term. Hence, such policy packages should not be viewed as alternatives to carbon pricing, but rather as complements that provide entry points to achieve the Paris climate goals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据