4.7 Article

Photodegradation of atrazine in the presence of indole-3-acetic acid and natural montmorillonite clay minerals

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 240, 期 -, 页码 793-801

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.05.002

关键词

Atrazine; Montmorillonite; Indole-3-acetic acid; Hydrated electron; Hydroxyl radical

资金

  1. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2014CB441102]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [21237002, 21777066]
  3. Collaborative Innovation Center for Regional Environmental Quality

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Atrazine (2-chloro-4-ethylamino-6-isopropylamino-s-triazine) is a commonly used agricultural herbicide that, as a result, is frequently detected in surface and ground water. In this study, we provide evidence of the photo-oxidation of atrazine under environmentally relevant conditions, specifically, in the presence of natural montmorillonite clay and the ubiquitous phytohormone indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). The reaction is initiated by the generation of hydrated electrons from the photo-ionization of IAA. These electrons react with protons and dissolved oxygen to form hydroxyl radicals, which promote the further degradation of atrazine. Montmorillonite strongly enhances the yield of hydrated electrons and prolongs their lifetime, by stabilizing radical cations through electrostatic attraction by the negative charges embedded in the clay. Moreover, by providing a confined space, montmorillonite markedly increases the probability of contact between atrazine and the active radicals. Other factors strongly influencing the degradation process are the solution pH, the type of exchangeable cations present in the clay interlayer, and the hydration status of montmorillonite. Since both IAA and montmorillonite clay are widely distributed in the environment, the proposed reaction is predicted to play an important role in the degradation of atrazine and perhaps other potentially persistent organic contaminants. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据