4.6 Article

Competition and habitat filtering jointly explain phylogenetic structure of soil bacterial communities across elevational gradients

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 20, 期 7, 页码 2386-2396

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.14247

关键词

-

资金

  1. Special Fund for Forest Scientific Research in the Public Welfare of China [201504401]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30870231, 31300105]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) through the Ramon y Cajal programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The importance of assembly processes in shaping biological communities is poorly understood, especially for microbes. Here, we report on the forces that structure soil bacterial communities along a 2000 m elevational gradient. We characterized the relative importance of habitat filtering and competition on phylogenetic structure and turnover in bacterial communities. Bacterial communities exhibited a phylogenetically clustered pattern and were more clustered with increasing elevation. Biotic factors (i.e., relative abundance of dominant bacterial lineages) appeared to be most important to the degree of clustering, evidencing the role of the competitive ability of entire clades in shaping the communities. Phylogenetic turnover showed the greatest correlation to elevation. After controlling the elevation, biotic factors showed greater correlation to phylogenetic turnover than all the habitat variables (i.e., climate, soil and vegetation). Structural equation modelling also identified that elevation and soil organic matter exerted indirect effects on phylogenetic diversity and turnover by determining the dominance of microbial competitors. Our results suggest that competition among bacterial taxa induced by soil carbon contributes to the phylogenetic pattern across elevational gradient in the Tibetan Plateau. This highlights the importance of considering not only abiotic filtering but also biotic interactions in soil bacterial communities across stressful elevational gradients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据