4.8 Article

Causality test of ambient fine particles and human influenza in Taiwan: Age group-specific disparity and geographic heterogeneity

期刊

ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL
卷 111, 期 -, 页码 354-361

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2017.10.011

关键词

Ambient fine particles; Bayesian MCMC method; Over-dispersion; Integer-valued GARCH; Generalized Poisson; Posterior odds ratio

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST grant) [105-2118-M-035-003-MY2]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST) [103-2314-B-039-010-MY3, 103-2115-M-039-002-MY2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Influenza is a major global public health problem, with serious outcomes that can result in hospitalization or even death. We investigate the causal relationship between human influenza cases and air pollution, quantified by ambient fine particles < 2.5 mu m in aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5). A modified Granger causality test is proposed to ascertain age group-specific causal relationship between weekly influenza cases and weekly adjusted accumulative PM2.5 from 2009 to 2015 in 11 cities and counties in Taiwan. We examine the causal relationship based on posterior probabilities of the log-linear integer-valued GARCH (generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedastic) model with covariates, which enable us to handle characteristics of influenza data such as integer-value, lagged dependence, and over-dispersion. The resulting posterior probabilities show that the adult age group (25-64) and the elderly group in New Taipei in the north and cities in southwestern part of Taiwan are strongly affected by ambient fine particles. Moreover, the elderly group is clearly affected in all study sites. Globalization and economic growth have resulted in increased ambient air pollution (including PM2.5) and subsequently substantial public health concerns in the West Pacific region. Minimizing exposure to air pollutants is particularly important for the elderly and susceptible individuals with respiratory diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据