4.7 Article

Cathode catalyst layer design with gradients of ionomer distribution for proton exchange membrane fuel cells

期刊

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
卷 171, 期 -, 页码 1476-1486

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.06.078

关键词

Proton exchange membrane fuel cell; Cathode catalyst layer design; Short-side-chain (SSC) ionomers; Cell performance

资金

  1. Ontario-China Research and Innovation Fund (OCRIF)
  2. Automotive Partnership Canada (APC) through the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [APCPJ 417858 - 11]
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cathode catalyst layer (CCL) design is critically important for improved performance, durability and stability of proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells. In this study, CCL is designed to consist of two sub-layers with different loadings of short-side chain (SSC) ionomer and platinum (Pt) catalyst for each sub-layer; and such CCLs are manufactured and characterized through morphological, microstructural, physical, and electrochemical characterizations, and the performance of single scaled-up cells containing such CCL designs is measured. The results show that the two-layer design results in a higher porosity and mean pore size, and hence higher air permeability, and provides distinctively higher catalyst activity and Pt utilization for the CCL than the conventional single-layer design under the same overall loadings of the ionomer and Pt for the entire CCL. It is also found that a higher ionomer loading in the first sub-layer (faced to the membrane) is beneficial to cell performance, and the Pt loading in this sub-layer plays a considerably important role as well. Overall, it is demonstrated that with a proper ionomer/Pt-gradient design, it is possible to achieve favorable morphological and microstructural characteristics that lessen ionic resistance while improving mass transport capability, catalyst activity, and Pt utilization, hence overall cell performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据