4.5 Article

Simultaneous isolation and preconcentration of exosomes by ion concentration polarization

期刊

ELECTROPHORESIS
卷 39, 期 15, 页码 2029-2038

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/elps.201700491

关键词

Exosomes; Ion concentration polarization; Microfluidics

资金

  1. NIH [1R21AI105361-01A1, 1R21CA206904-01, HG009010-01]
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R21CA206904] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE [R21HG009010] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R21AI105361] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exosomes carry microRNA biomarkers, occur in higher abundance in cancerous patients than in healthy ones, and because they are present in most biofluids, including blood and urine, these can be obtained noninvasively. Standard laboratory techniques to isolate exosomes are expensive, time consuming, provide poor purity, and recover on the order of 25% of the available exosomes. We present a new microfluidic technique to simultaneously isolate exosomes and preconcentrate them by electrophoresis using a high transverse local electric field generated by ion-depleting ion-selective membrane. We use pressure-driven flow to deliver an exosome sample to a microfluidic chip such that the transverse electric field forces them out of the cross flow and into an agarose gel which filters out unwanted cellular debris while the ion-selective membrane concentrates the exosomes through an enrichment effect. We efficiently isolated exosomes from 1x PBS buffer, cell culture media, and blood serum. Using flow rates from 150 to 200L/h and field strengths of 100V/cm, we consistently captured between 60 and 80% of exosomes from buffer, cell culture media, and blood serum as confirmed by both fluorescence spectroscopy and nanoparticle tracking analysis. Our microfluidic chip maintained this recovery rate for more than 20min with a concentration factor of 15 for 10min of isolation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据