4.7 Article

Role of carbon ion beams irradiation in mitigating cold stress in Arabidopsis thaliana

期刊

ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY
卷 162, 期 -, 页码 341-347

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.07.013

关键词

Arabidopsis thaliana; Carbon ion beams irradiation; Cold-related genes; Reactive oxygen species

资金

  1. National Natural Science Fund of China [11605159, 11704343, 11405147]
  2. Chinese Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M612412]
  3. Foundation for University Key Teachers of Henan Province [2015186]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon ion beams irradiation as an important type of ionizing radiation is one of the major approaches used to create mutants in plants. This study investigated the role of carbon ion beams irradiation in mitigating cold stress in Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings. The results showed that 50-Gy carbon ion beam irradiation appeared stimulatory effects on root length and fresh weight in Arabidopsis seedlings under cold stress. In comparison with control, the content of hydrogen peroxide, the production rate of superoxide anion radical, hydroxyl radical generation activity, and malondialdehyde content were obviously decreased in 50-Gy carbon ion beam irradiated seedlings in response to cold stress. Moreover, irradiated 50-Gy carbon ion beam in Arabidopsis seedlings were significantly triggered the efficiency of antioxidant under cold stress. Furthermore, we investigated the expression of cold-related genes in irradiated and non-irradiated samples. Carbon ion beams irradiation up-regulated the expression levels of C-REPEAT BINDING FACTORS (CBFs), INDUCER OF CBF EXPRESSION 1 (ICE1), ICE2, CALMODULIN-BINDING TRANSCRIPTION ACTIVATOR 3 (CAMTA3) and cold-regulated COR genes, in response to cold stress. This study suggests that low-dose carbon ion beams irradiation can modulate the physiological responses and up-regulate cold signaling genes in mitigating cold stress in the growth of Arabidopsis seedlings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据