4.7 Article

Seed banks of native forbs, but not exotic grasses, increase during extreme drought

期刊

ECOLOGY
卷 99, 期 4, 页码 896-903

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ecy.2160

关键词

drought; exotic; extreme climate event; forb; functional trait; grass; grassland; native; seed bank; specific leaf area

类别

资金

  1. NSF
  2. UC Davis Jastro Shields Research Grant
  3. Hatch Project [CA-D-PLS-2017-H]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Extreme droughts such as the one that affected California in 2012-2015 have been linked to severe ecological consequences in perennial-dominated communities such as forests. In annual communities, drought impacts are difficult to assess because many species persist through facultative multiyear seed dormancy, which leads to the development of seed banks. Impacts of extreme drought on the abundance and composition of the seed banks of whole communities are little known. In 80 heterogeneous grassland plots where cover is dominated by similar to 15 species of exotic annual grasses and diversity is dominated by similar to 70 species of native annual forbs, we grew out seeds from soil cores collected early in the California drought (2012) and later in the multiyear drought (2014), and analyzed drought-associated changes in the seed bank. Over the course of the study we identified more than 22,000 seedlings to species. We found that seeds of exotic annual grasses declined sharply in abundance during the drought while seeds of native annual forbs increased, a pattern that resembled but was even stronger than the changes in aboveground cover of these groups. Consistent with the expectation that low specific leaf area (SLA) is an indicator of drought tolerance, we found that the community-weighted mean SLA of annual forbs declined both in the seed bank and in the aboveground community, as low-SLA forbs increased disproportionately. In this system, seed dormancy reinforces the indirect benefits of extreme drought to the native forb community.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据