4.7 Article

Phasing Out Mercury? Ecological Economics and Indonesia's Small-Scale Gold Mining Sector

期刊

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
卷 144, 期 -, 页码 1-11

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.025

关键词

Mercury pollution; Ecological economics; Small-scale gold mining; Artisanal gold mining; Environmental governance; Cleaner technology; Marginalisation; Minamata Convention on Mercury

资金

  1. Canadian International Resources and Development Institute (CIRDI) [2014-077]
  2. Global Affairs Canada
  3. UK Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)
  4. ESRC [ES/N006240/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article uses an ecological economics approach to analyse tensions surrounding efforts to phase out mercury in Indonesia's artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM) sector, among the largest sources of mercury pollution worldwide. Many scholars and environmental activists have long hoped that global restrictions in mercury trade would drive up mercury prices and decrease mercury use and pollution in ASGM. However, in Indonesia, despite global mercury trade restrictions, recent increases in domestic mercury supplies through new cinnabar mining developments have made mercury less expensive and more available, destabilizing efforts at reducing mercury use. This article discusses implications of domestic cinnabar mining for controlling mercury in Indonesia's ASGM sector, highlighting obstacles to implementing the Minamata Convention, a treaty that aims to restrict mercury use. We link discussion of mercury mining to other socioeconomic processes, labour relations and power dynamics shaping mercury use in gold mining and hindering collectivised mercury-free technology uptake. Examining new evidence regarding the social metabolism of a changing extractive economy, we underscore why an integrated ecological economics paradigm carefully grounding analysis in the context of local labour situations is needed to challenge assumptions and inform new strategies for mercury reduction/elimination in ASGM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据