4.2 Article

Shionodiscus gaarderae sp nov (Thalassiosirales, Thalassiosiraceae), a bloom-producing diatom from the southwestern Atlantic Ocean, and emendation of Shionodiscus bioculatus var. bioculatus

期刊

DIATOM RESEARCH
卷 33, 期 1, 页码 25-37

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/0269249X.2017.1423112

关键词

Thalassiosira bioculata; Thalassiosira bioculata var; raripora; Shionodiscus rosulatus; spring bloom; Argentine Sea

资金

  1. CONICET [GEF-PNUD ARG 02/18, PIP 01734]
  2. project UCAR-UNLP in the Beagle Channel

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The recently established diatom genus Shionodiscus is characterized as possessing a labiate process on the valve face and strutted processes with long internal and reduced, or no, external extensions. Many Thalassiosira species with these features were transferred to this new genus, as well as some with short internal, strutted process extensions. Examination of samples from the Argentine continental shelf and slope waters, and from the Beagle Channel, revealed the presence of a small centric diatom that formed an extensive bloom in slope waters during spring 2005 and 2006. Analysis by light and electron microscopy revealed high similarity to specimens previously referred as Thalassiosira bioculata var. raripora. This name was never effectively published; nevertheless, the name has been adopted and observations referring to it have been reported on several occasions. Here we trace the usage of the (nomenclaturally invalid) name Thalassiosira bioculata var. raripora in the literature, and formally describe the species as Shionodiscus gaarderae, based on our observations and comparison with previous reports. A morphological comparison of this and similar taxa is also provided. In addition, we offer an emended description of S. bioculatus var. bioculatus from Ostenfeld material sampled from the Faroer Island Nastro Fjord Plankton (16.9.1902)', held in the Hustedt collection. Finally, we propose the transfer of Thalassiosira rosulata to Shionodiscus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据