4.7 Article

Comparative efficacy and safety of the duodenal-jejunal bypass liner in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A case control study

期刊

DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM
卷 20, 期 8, 页码 1868-1877

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dom.13300

关键词

glycaemic control; obesity therapy; type 2 diabetes; weight control

资金

  1. GI Dynamics Inc., Lexington, MD, USA
  2. INNODIA
  3. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung [FKZ 01GI1106]
  4. European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes
  5. Deutsche Diabetes Gesellschaft
  6. IMI-JU DIRECT
  7. GI Dynamics Inc., Lexington, Massachusetts (GID)
  8. Kompetenznetz Diabetes Mellitus (Competence Network for Diabetes Mellitus)
  9. Federal Ministry of Education and Research [FKZ 01GI1106]
  10. European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes (EFSD)
  11. DIRECT
  12. DDG

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: The duodenal-jejunal bypass liner (DJBL) is an endoscopic device mimicking surgical duodenal-jejunal bypass, and is indicated for the treatment of obesity-associated type 2 diabetes mellitus. This analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the DJBL in comparison to lifestyle changes and antidiabetic drugs. Materials and Methods: To determine the efficacy and long-term safety of the DJBL, data concerning 235 obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from the German DJBL registry were analysed. For comparison with standard treatment, propensity-score-matching with patients from the German DPV registry, including the matching parameters sex, age, diabetes duration, baseline BMI and baseline HbA1c, was applied. The final matched cohort consisted of 111 patients in the DJBL group and 222 matched control DPV patients. Results: Mean treatment time with the DJBL was 47.5 +/- 12.2weeks, mean BMI reduction was 5.0 kg/m(2) (P <.001) and mean HbA1c reduction was 1.3% (11.9 mmol/mol) (P < .001). Reduction of antidiabetic medications and improvements in other metabolic and cardiovascular risk parameters was observed. In comparison to the matched control group, mean reductions in HbA1c (-1.37% vs -0.51% [12.6 vs 3.2 mmol/mol]; P < .0001) and BMI (-3.02 kg/m(2) vs -0.39 kg/m(2); P < .0001) were significantly higher. Total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and blood pressure were also significantly better. Conclusion: This study provides the largest, so far, hypothesis-generating evidence for a putative positive risk/benefit ratio for treatment of obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with the DJBL as an alternative treatment option for this patient population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据