4.6 Review

Immunotherapy, an evolving approach for the management of triple negative breast cancer: Converting non-responders to responders

期刊

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY
卷 122, 期 -, 页码 202-207

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.01.005

关键词

Triple negative breast cancer; Avelumab; Pembrolizumab; Novolumab; Atezolizumab; Abemaciclib

资金

  1. Fulbright scholar research grant
  2. L'Oreal UNESCO for Women in Science Levant and Egypt award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Immunotherapy comprises a promising new era in cancer therapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting either the programmed death (PD)-1 receptor or its ligand PD-L1 were first approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the management of metastatic melanoma in 2011. The approval of this class is being extended to include other types of immunogenic tumors. Although breast cancer (BC) was first categorized as non-immunogenic tumor type, there are certain subsets of BC that showed a high level of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Those subsets include the triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and HER-2 positive breast tumors. Preliminary data from clinical trials presented promising outcomes for patients with advanced stage/metastatic TNBC. While the objective response rate (ORR) was relatively low, it is still promising because of the observation that the patients who respond to the treatment with immune checkpoint blockade have favorable prognosis and often show a significant increase in the overall survival. Therefore, the main challenge is to find ways to enhance the tumor response to such therapy and to convert the non-responders to responders. This will consequently bring new hopes for patients with advanced stage metastatic TNBC and help to decrease death tolls from this devastating disease. In the current review, we are highlighting and discussing the up-to-date strategies adopted at either the preclinical or the clinical settings to enhance tumor responsiveness to immunotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据