4.7 Article

Maximum paste coating thickness without voids clogging of pervious concrete and its relationship to the rheological properties of cement paste

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 168, 期 -, 页码 732-746

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.128

关键词

Maximum paste coating thickness; Clogging of voids; Paste drainage test; Rheological properties; Pervious concrete

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program [2016YFB0303502]
  2. Water Resource Science and Technology Innovation Program of Guangdong Province [2016-23]
  3. Guangdong Special Support for Youth Science and Technology Innovation Talents [2015TQ01C312]
  4. Pearl River Science and Technology Nova Program of Guangzhou [201610010098]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

All mixture design methods for pervious concrete have been proposed under the hypothesis that cement paste uniformly coats on the surface of aggregate and does not drain off from the aggregate surface to clog the interconnected voids between aggregate particles. To evaluate the maximum paste coating thickness on aggregate (MPCT) that will not result in clogging of voids, understanding of the relationship between the MPCT and the rheological properties of cement paste was reviewed and theoretically analyzed in the present study. A paste drainage test was developed on a flow table to determine the MPCT, with specification of test variables (in terms of the number of flow table drops, the sieve mesh size, and the aggregate size) to ensure good repeatability and precision. Based on testing data of 39 cement pastes, uniform relationships between yield stress, viscosity, mini-slump spread and MPCT were established. The resulting empirical functions were validated by comparing the predicted and measured MPCTs for additional tests. The results will give a better understanding of a critical criterion for mixture design and clogging prediction of pervious concrete. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据