4.7 Article

A three-phase method for Pythagorean fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making and application to haze management

期刊

COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
卷 123, 期 -, 页码 348-363

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2018.07.005

关键词

Pythagorean fuzzy set; Multi-attribute group decision making; Riemann closeness degree; Normalized projection; Entropy; Haze management

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71740021, 61263018, 11461030, 71661010]
  2. Young scientists Training object of Jiangxi province [20151442040081]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province of China [20171BAB201011]
  4. Thirteen five Programming Project of Jiangxi province Social Science [16GL19, 17GL33]
  5. Guangxi Natural Science Foundation [2016GXNSFBA380077]
  6. Guangxi Philosophy and Social Science Programming Project [15FGL011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pythagorean fuzzy set (PFS), as a new extension of intuitionistic fuzzy set (IFS), has recently been utilized to describe uncertain information in decision making. This paper aims to develop a three-phase method for addressing multi-attribute group decision making (MAGDM) with Pythagorean fuzzy numbers (PFNs) and apply to haze management. Firstly, the normalized projection of PFNs is defined. Then the entropy and Riemann closeness degree of PFNs are proposed. Based on the normalized projection of PFNs, an extended TOPSIS method is presented to determine the DMs' weights. A collective decision matrix is obtained by aggregating individual matrices with the DMs' weights. Subsequently, the deviation of score from entropy and the deviation of accuracy from entropy are defined, respectively. Then a multi-objective parametric comprehensive deviation program. ming model is constructed to derive the attribute weights. A weighted collective matrix is obtained by the derived attribute weights. The positive ideal solution (PIS) and negative ideal solution (NIS) are determined according to the weighted collective matrix. By calculating the Riemann closeness degrees of alternatives to PIS and NIS, the ranking values of alternatives are computed to generate the ranking order of alternatives. Finally, a haze management example is elaborated to illustrate the feasibility of the proposed method. To illustrate the stability and practicality of the proposed method, the sensitivity analysis, validity test and comparative analysis are conducted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据