4.7 Article

The compressive properties of sandwich structures based on an egg-box core design

期刊

COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING
卷 144, 期 -, 页码 143-152

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.03.007

关键词

carbon-fibre; glass fibre; impact behaviour; finite element analysis (FEA); Composite egg-box

资金

  1. Government of India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lightweight cores, based on an egg-box core design, have been manufactured using a simple compression moulding technique. Two types of composite prepreg were used to manufacture the core materials, these being a woven carbon fibre reinforced epoxy and a woven glass fibre reinforced epoxy. The resulting cores were of a high quality, exhibiting little or no wrinkling following the manufacturing procedure. Subsequent compression tests at quasi-static rates of loading showed that the compression strength of the core depended strongly on the level of constraint applied during testing, with sandwich panels based on composite skins bonded to an egg-box core offering a load-bearing capability that was more than double that of its unconstrained counterpart. The quasi static compression strength of the carbon-based cores has been shown to be slightly higher than the glass fibre systems, particularly at higher core densities. Local splitting damage at cell joining regions and crushing of the cell of the egg-box structure was identified as the primary failure mechanism in the sandwich panels. Impact tests, conducted using a drop-weight impact tower, have shown that the compression strength of the egg-box cores is higher at dynamic rates of loading than at quasi-static rates. Here again, the local splitting and crushing was the primary mode of failure in the sandwich structures. Finally, the finite element technique has been used to model the mechanical response of these core designs under both quasi-static and impact loading testing conditions. Here, agreement between the predicted and observed responses was found to be good for both extremes of loading-rate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据