4.7 Article

Effects of the multilayer structures on Exenatide release and bioactivity in microsphere/thermosensitive hydrogel system

期刊

COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES
卷 171, 期 -, 页码 85-93

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.04.063

关键词

Exenatide; Emulsion electrospray; PLGA microspheres; Thermosensitive hydrogel; Release rate; Bioactivity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traditional polypeptide-loaded PLGA microspheres (PM) using emulsion electrospray techniques often exhibit unsteady release and limited bioactivity. To solve these two problems, an Exenatide (EXT)-loaded multilayer system composed ofPM and thermosensitive hydrogel was prepared by the emulsion electrospray technique in this study. Hydrogel mixture were loaded in PLGA microspheres as Depot-hydrogel to prepare Gel/PM. The PM/Gel and Gel/PM/Gel systems were obtained by dispersion of PM and Gel/PM into hydrogel mixture, respectively. EXT in Gel/PM/Gel showed a constantly in vitro release for 30 days, which was significantly enhanced in comparison of those in the PM/Gel and the Gel/PM. PM/Gel and Gel/PM/Gel showed diminished burst release and no platform period compared with PM and Gel/PM. And these could be because the introduced Matrix-hydrogel outside, as a buffer layer, inhibited burst releases and exhibited a sustained manner. The inner Depot-hydrogelstructure slowed the PLGA degradation rate and drug release rate. As well, more than 15-day blood glucose levels in KKAy mice were greatly maintained at 7.50-9.50 mmol/L after a single subcutaneous injection of Gel/PM/Gel (4.95 mu g/kg). Spatial stability and further bioactivity of released EXT were well protected by EXT-hydrogel complexes, and undesirable uptake of EXT and microspheres via phagocytes were also decreased by PEG shell. Thus, the long-acting microspheres/hydrogel multilayer system prepared by emulsion electrospray technique showed promising potentials for loading hydrophilic polypeptides and proteins. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据