4.7 Article

Cellular interactions of functionalized superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles on oligodendrocytes without detrimental side effects: Cell death induction, oxidative stress and inflammation

期刊

COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES
卷 170, 期 -, 页码 454-462

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.06.041

关键词

SPIONS; Oligodentrocytes 158N cells; Uptake quantification; Cell death induction; Oxidative stress; Inflammation

资金

  1. Universite de Bourgogne (Dijon, France)
  2. Region Bourgogne (PARI 2012-2013) [2009-9201CPERO2S410]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Iron oxide nanoparticles have the capability to cross Blood Brain Barrier (BBB) and hence are widely investigated for biomedical operations in the central nervous system. Before being used for the biomedical purpose, it is necessary to investigate its biocompatibility, dosimetry and biological interaction. In the present study, in-house synthesized superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) were functionalized using the polymer, PolyEthylene Glycol (PEG) and a fluorophore (Rhodamine). The interaction of these nanoparticles with murine oligodendrocytes 158N was studied using different assays. The nanoparticles were taken up by the cells via endocytosis and there was a dose-dependent increase in the intracellular iron content as revealed by flow cytometry, transmission electron microscopy and confocal microscopy. Nanoparticles remained stable inside cells even after 24 h. Cell sorting capacity using a magnet depended on the number of particles interact per cell. SPIONs exhibited good biocompatibility as no toxicological responses, including morphological changes, loss of viability, oxidative stress or inflammatory response (IL-1 beta, IL-6 secretion) were observed. Together, these data show that the in-house synthesized SPIONs have no side effects on 158N cells, and constitute interesting tools for biomedical applications across brain, including cellular imaging and targeting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据