4.7 Article

Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in multiple sclerosis: A prospective, rater-blinded analysis of relapse rates during pregnancy and the postnatal period

期刊

CNS NEUROSCIENCE & THERAPEUTICS
卷 25, 期 1, 页码 78-85

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cns.12985

关键词

intravenous immunoglobulins; multiple sclerosis; postpartum period; pregnancy; treatment

资金

  1. Bayer Healthcare
  2. Roche
  3. Biogen
  4. Genzyme
  5. Teva
  6. Bayer Pharma AG
  7. Novartis Pharma AG
  8. Biogen IDEC
  9. Sanofi-Aventis GmbH

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Multiple sclerosis (MS) affects predominantly young women. Currently available disease-modifying drugs have neither been approved during pregnancy nor nursing. Aims Evaluating the effect of treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) in MS patients with desire to have a baby. Methods In all, 70 MS patients were either treated with IVIg before conception, during first trimester of pregnancy and 12 months postnatal (group I, n = 38) or started IVIg after delivery for 12 months (group II, n = 23) or were untreated (group III, n = 9). Relapse rates and disease progression were analyzed. Results Pre-gestational relapse rates differed between groups. Lowest relapse rates were observed during late pregnancy, followed by an elevated relapse rate after delivery compared to the pre-pregnancy year and the first trimester. Only in group I, the postnatal relapse rate did not exceed the relapse rate before conception. IVIg treatment did not influence disease progression after delivery. Conclusions In MS patients, IVIg treatment during and/or after delivery is an option to reduce the incidence of relapses during pregnancy and the postnatal period. Surprisingly, untreated patients becoming pregnant showed an increase in the relapse rate in the first trimester compared with the pre-gestational period. How alterations of hormone status during pregnancy affect disease activity in MS has to be further investigated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据