4.7 Article

Variable domain glycosylation of ACPA-IgG: A missing link in the maturation of the ACPA response?

期刊

CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 186, 期 -, 页码 34-37

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clim.2017.09.001

关键词

Rheumatoid arthritis; ACPA-Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibodies; Fab; Glycosylation

资金

  1. ReumaFonds [15-2-402, 12-2-403] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anti-citrullinated Protein Antibodies (ACPA) are excellent markers for Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and are postulated to have a pathogenic role in the disease process. A multistep model for the evolution of the ACPA response in RA was proposed in which an initial break of tolerance causes, as first hit, silent production of ACPA without any clinical symptoms. The model further proposes that the ACPA immune response matures upon a certain (unknown) trigger, a second hit, which leads to epitope spreading, an increase in ACPA titres and extended isotype usage before clinical RA manifestations. These occurrences are indicative of an expansion of the citrulline-specific B cell response, though ACPA remain of low avidity even in established disease. This persistence of low avidity is puzzling, as the typical signs of maturation of the immune response seem to be uncoupled from the classical process of affinity maturation. In fact, it suggests that B cells expressing ACPA could bypass selection mechanisms that otherwise control the expansion of auto-reactive B cells. In the established, chronic phase, we recently found that ACPA-IgG are extensively glycosylated in the variable (Fab) domain. More than 90% of ACPA-IgG molecules carry Fab glycans that are highly sialylated. This molecular feature is striking and may provide a missing link in our understanding of the maturation of the ACPA immune response. This review, therefore, describes the current knowledge about ACPA Fab glycosylation in the pathogenesis of RA. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据