4.3 Article

Potential impact of invasive surgical procedures on primary tumor growth and metastasis

期刊

CLINICAL & EXPERIMENTAL METASTASIS
卷 35, 期 4, 页码 319-331

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10585-018-9896-8

关键词

Tumor resection; Biopsy; Metastasis; Tumor cell behavior; Immune suppression; Wound healing

类别

资金

  1. European Research Council [648804]
  2. CancerGenomics.nl (Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research) program
  3. Doctor Josef Steiner Foundation
  4. European Union [642866]
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [648804] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Surgical procedures such as tumor resection and biopsy are still the gold standard for diagnosis and (determination of) treatment of solid tumors, and are prognostically beneficial for patients. However, growing evidence suggests that even a minor surgical trauma can influence several (patho) physiological processes that might promote postoperative metastatic spread and tumor recurrence. Local effects include tumor seeding and a wound healing response that can promote tumor cell migration, proliferation, differentiation, extracellular matrix remodeling, angiogenesis and extravasation. In addition, local and systemic immunosuppression impairs antitumor immunity and contributes to tumor cell survival. Surgical manipulation of the tumor can result in cancer cell release into the circulation, thus increasing the chance of tumor cell dissemination. To prevent these undesired effects of surgical interventions, therapeutic strategies targeting immune response exacerbation or alteration have been proposed. This review summarizes the current literature regarding these local, systemic and secondary site effects of surgical interventions on tumor progression and dissemination, and discusses studies that aimed to identify potential therapeutic approaches to prevent these effects in order to further increase the clinical benefit from surgical procedures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据