4.7 Article

A pilot study of the metabolomic profiles of saliva from female orthodontic patients with external apical root resorption

期刊

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 478, 期 -, 页码 188-193

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2017.12.046

关键词

Orthodontically induced external apical root resorption; Metabolomics; H-1 NMR spectroscopy; Inflammation; Oxidative stress; Saliva

资金

  1. Sci-Tech Plan in Sichuan Province [2014SZ0050]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Orthodontically induced external apical root resorption (OIEARR) is one of the most severe complications of orthodontic treatment, which is hard to diagnose at early stage by merely radiographic examination. This study aimed to identify salivary metabolic products using unbiased metabolic profiling in order to discover biomarkers that may indicate OIEARR. Materials and methods: Unstimulated saliva samples were analyzed from 19 healthy orthodontic patients with EARR (n = 8) and non-EARR (n = 11). Metabolite profiling was performed using H-1 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Results: A total of 187 metabolites were found in saliva samples. With supervised partial least squares discriminant analysis and regression analysis, samples from 2 groups were well separated, attributed by a series of metabolites of interest, including butyrate, propane-1,2-diol, alpha-linolenic acid (Ala), alpha-glucose, urea, fumarate, formate, guanosine, purine, etc. Indicating the increased inflammatory responses in the periodontal tissues possibly associated with energy metabolism and oxidative stress. Conclusions: The effective separation capacity of H-1 NMR based metabolomics suggested potential feasibility of clinical application in monitoring periodontal and apical condition in orthodontic patients during treatment and make early diagnosis of OIEARR. Metabolites detected in this study need further validation to identify exact biomarkers of OIEARR. Saliva biomarkers may assist in diagnosis and monitoring of this disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据