4.7 Article

Synthesis of SiO2@SiO2 core-shell microspheres using urea-formaldehyde polymers as the templates for fast separation of small solutes and proteins

期刊

CHINESE CHEMICAL LETTERS
卷 29, 期 1, 页码 213-216

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2017.06.004

关键词

Core-shell silica microsphere; Polymerization-induced colloid aggregation; Urea-formaldehyde polymers; Fast separation; HPLC

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21545007, 21605122]
  2. Foundation of Key Laboratory in Shaanxi Province [2010J5103, 11JS097, 15JS115]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Superficially porous core-shell silica microspheres (CSSMs) have been a great success for the fast separation of small molecules and proteins in recent years. In this paper, the CSSMs were synthesized by an improved polymerization-induced colloid aggregation (PICA) method using urea-formaldehyde polymers as the templates. The agglomeration of the functionalized silica core was avoided by the surface modification through reflux with ureidopropyltrimethoxysilane in the neutral ethanol solution at 80 degrees C, and the secondary nucleation of the silica nanoparticles during the preparation process could also be inhibited via the optimization of the reaction conditions, such as pH, temperature, colloidal silica sol concentration and the reaction time. The controllable shell thickness and pore size of the synthesized monodisperse CSSMs were successfully obtained by adjusting the weight ratio of silica core/colloidal silica sol and the particle size of colloidal silica sol, respectively. The C18-modified CSSMs with different pore sizes were used to separate small solutes and proteins. The higher efficient separation and relatively low back pressure of the synthesized core-shell column demonstrate that the CSSMs have a great potential application for fast HPLC (C) 2017 Chinese Chemical Society and Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据