4.5 Article

Direct Prediction of EPR Spectra from Lipid Bilayers: Understanding Structure and Dynamics in Biological Membranes

期刊

CHEMPHYSCHEM
卷 19, 期 17, 页码 2183-2193

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201800386

关键词

biological membranes; EPR spectroscopy; molecular dynamics simulations; spin probes; cholesterol

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/L001322/1, EP/P007554/1, EP/L00111X/1]
  2. Research and Specialist Computing Support service at the University of East Anglia (UEA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Of the many biophysical techniques now being brought to bear on studies of membranes, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) of nitroxide spin probes was the first to provide information about both mobility and ordering in lipid membranes. Here, we report the first prediction of variable temperature EPR spectra of model lipid bilayers in the presence and absence of cholesterol from the results of large scale fully atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Three types of structurally different spin probes were employed in order to study different parts of the bilayer. Our results demonstrate very good agreement with experiment and thus confirm the accuracy of the latest lipid force fields. The atomic resolution of the simulations allows the interpretation of the molecular motions and interactions in terms of their impact on the sensitive EPR line shapes. Direct versus indirect effects of cholesterol on the dynamics of spin probes are analysed. Given the complexity of structural organisation in lipid bilayers, the advantage of using a combined MD-EPR simulation approach is two-fold. Firstly, prediction of EPR line shapes directly from MD trajectories of actual phospholipid structures allows unambiguous interpretation of EPR spectra of biological membranes in terms of complex motions. Secondly, such an approach provides an ultimate test bed for the up-to-date MD simulation models employed in the studies of biological membranes, an area that currently attracts great attention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据