4.7 Article

Towards high-powered remote WLED based on flexible white-luminescent polymer composite films containing S, N co-doped graphene quantum dots

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 336, 期 -, 页码 406-415

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.12.056

关键词

S,N-GQDs; Luminescent composite films; Flexibility; Solid-state lighting; Remote WLED

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51602077]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2016A030313663, 2016A030311006]
  3. Shenzhen Science and Technology Plan Supported Project [JCYJ20150625142543479]
  4. China Scholarship Council [201606125092]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this article, a new application of using S, N co-doped graphene quantum dots (S, N-GQDs) as ideal color converters in solid-state white light-emitting diode (WLED) is reported. To this end, the S, N-GQDs with an average diameter of similar to 4.46 nm are obtained by a hydrothermal approach using citric acid and thiourea as source materials. The PL spectra of S, N-GQDs show an excitation-independent behavior in the range of 300-380 nm. Under UV illumination, the S, N-GQDs display intense blue-light with the quantum yield of 51.2%. The PL mechanism is also investigated. Then, we fabricate freestanding luminescent composite films in a solution casting method by combining S, N-GQDs with YAG:Ce3+ phosphors based on a polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) matrix. The luminescent films have superior foldability and photostability and excellent heat resistance, and retain their optical performances in the solid-state. To realize their potential, a high-powered remote WLED has been demonstrated. The results indicate that S, N-GQDs and YAG:Ce3+ can be homogeneously dispersed in the PVA without aggregation so that uniform white-light emission can be obtained. These composite films containing S, N-GQDs are promising to be used in state-of-the-art UV-pumped remote WLED according to their wide wavelength emission and collapsible illumination device.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据