4.7 Article

A new statistical physics model for the ternary adsorption of Cu2+, Cd2+ and Zn2+ ions on bone char: Experimental investigation and simulations

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 343, 期 -, 页码 544-553

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.03.033

关键词

Ternary adsorption; Statistical physics model; Cadmium; Copper; Zinc

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new statistical physics model is developed to elucidate the ternary adsorption of some heavy metal ions, i.e. copper (Cu2+), cadmium (Cd2+) and zinc (Zn2+) on bone char. The model is derived by the partition function describing the statistical properties in thermodynamic equilibrium of the investigated adsorption system. Ternary equilibrium adsorption isotherms of these heavy metals on bone char are determined and analyzed at different temperatures (30, 40 and 50 degrees C). The study of the adsorption capacity shows that the bone char is more effective to remove Cu2+ ions, in both single-compound and ternary systems, while Cd2+ and Zn2+ are adsorbed at lower but similar extent. Moreover, in ternary system, all the adsorption capacities are reduced and Cd2+ and Zn2+ experienced the highest competition effects, as their adsorption capacity significantly decreased with respect to single-compound counterparts. On the other hand, the ternary statistical physics model includes several physicochemical parameters that can attribute microscopic insights to the investigated system. The application of this model indicates that all heavy metal ions are mainly bonded by a horizontal position on bone char. By analyzing and comparing the evolution of the number of ions bonded per adsorbent receptor site (RS), an inhibition effect is observed. The new model is also adopted to characterize the energy of the system, in terms of the interactions between heavy metal ions and adsorbent surface. In particular, both single-compound and ternary adsorption on bone char are endothermic and mainly characterized by physisorption, with a tendency to chemisorption, as confirmed by model outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据