4.7 Article

The role of a MnO2 functional layer on the surface of Ni-rich cathode materials: Towards enhanced chemical stability on exposure to air

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 44, 期 11, 页码 13341-13348

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.04.166

关键词

Lithium ion battery; Ni-rich cathode materials; LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2; Coating; Storage performance

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2014CB643406]
  2. Application Projects of Integrated Standardization and New Paradigm for Intelligent Manufacturing from the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of China in 2016
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University [2017zzts117]
  4. collaborative Innovation center of Manganese-Zinc-Vanadium Industrial Technology the 2011 plan of Hunan province)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The severe degradation of Ni-rich cathode materials on exposure to air is a crucial restriction for their large-scale application. To overcome this issue, a MnO2 functional layer has been introduced to the surface of LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 oxide via a wet-chemical method. Compared with pristine sample, the modified LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 shows an enhanced chemical stability because of its low sensitivity to moisture and CO2. The formation of absorbed Li2CO3/LiOH species and spontaneous reduction of Ni3+ to Ni2+ on the surface of MnO2-modified sample have been delayed remarkably, which is confirmed by characterizations of SEM, TEM, XPS and FTIR. Benefit from these merits, the modified LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 displays a specific capacity of 183 mAh g(-1) at 0.1 C after air-storage for 40 days, while the pristine sample drops from 195 to 144 mAh g(-1) promptly. Meanwhile, the MnO2 layer inhibits the generation of HF and protects the active material against the erosion of electrolyte in the working cell. Therefore, the MnO2 modified LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 after storage shows a capacity retention of 87.1% at 1 C after 100 cycles, which is more stable than that of stored pristine sample (70.3%).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据