4.7 Article

Effect of concrete rheological properties on quality of formed surfaces cast with self-consolidating concrete and superworkable concrete

期刊

CEMENT & CONCRETE COMPOSITES
卷 93, 期 -, 页码 75-84

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.06.016

关键词

Bleeding; Bugholes; Image analysis; Rheology; Segregation; Surface air voids; Surface quality

资金

  1. National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. NSERC Chair on High Performance Flowable Concrete with Adapted Rheology at the Universite de Sherebrooke

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An experimental program was undertaken to evaluate the effect of rheology of self-consolidating concrete and superworkable concrete on formed surface quality. In total, 31 mixtures with different workability and rheological properties were cast in a specially designed Z-shaped column without any mechanical consolidation. Surface defects, including surface air voids, signs of bleeding, segregation, and low filling ability were evaluated using a proposed image analysis methodology. The proposed method was successfully compared to other approaches that mainly target the detection of surface voids. Statistical models were developed between surface defect characteristics of formed surfaces cast with self-consolidating concrete and superworkable concrete and the rheological properties of the concrete. Concrete mixtures with yield stress lower than 25 Pa were found to develop superior surface finish. It was also observed that a prolonged delay in cement hydration of mixtures with yield stress lower than 50 Pa could lead to surface defects associated with bleeding. Mixtures with yield stress greater than 100 Pa exhibited considerable surface defects caused by insufficient filling ability of the concrete in the absence of mechanical consolidation. Finally, surface defects resulting from segregation were found with flowable concrete with plastic viscosity lower than 10 Pa s and yield stress lower than 100 Pa.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据