4.6 Article

miR-216b enhances the efficacy of vemurafenib by targeting Beclin-1, UVRAG and ATG5 in melanoma

期刊

CELLULAR SIGNALLING
卷 42, 期 -, 页码 30-43

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2017.09.024

关键词

miR-216b; Vemurafenib; Autophagy; Beclin-1; UVRAG; ATG5

资金

  1. Technology Innovation Program at the Beijing Institute of Technology
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81502868]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20150346]
  4. Shenzhen Science and Technology Program [JCYJ20150630145 302246]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Autophagy maintains cells survival in many stressful conditions including starvation, growth factor deprivation and misfolded protein accumulation. Additionally, autophagic survival mechanisms are used by transformed tumor cells to inhibit cell death, limit drug effectiveness and possibly generate drug resistance. However, the mechanism of how cells utilize autophagy during drug resistance is not fully understood. Here, we demonstrate that miR-216b plays an important role in alleviating drug resistance by regulating autophagy in melanoma. We show that miR-216b attenuates autophagy by directly targeting three key autophagy genes Beclin-1, UVRAG and ATG5. Overexpression of these genes from miRNA immune cDNA constructs rescue autophagic activity in the presence of miR-216b. Antagomir-mediated inactivation of endogenous miR-216b led to an increase of Beclin-1, UVRAG, ATG5, and subsequent autophagic activity. More importantly, we have discovered that BRAF(V600E) inhibitor vemurafenib suppresses miR-216b activity, which in turn activates autophagy to generate drug resistance in both BRAFi-sensitive and -resistant cells. Strikingly, ectopic expression of miR-216b increases the efficacy of vemurafenib both in vitro and in vivo. Taken together, these data indicate that miR-216b regulates autophagy by suppressing three key autophagy genes, and enhances the antitumor activity of vemurafenib in BRAF(V600E) melanoma cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据