4.6 Article

Modified ARCA analogs providing enhanced translational properties of capped mRNAs

期刊

CELL CYCLE
卷 17, 期 13, 页码 1624-1636

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2018.1486164

关键词

Cap; ARCA cap; N2 guanosine modification; cap-dependent translation; RNA therapy

资金

  1. Narodowe Centrum Nauki [DEC-2013/11/B/ST5/02226, DEC-2016/21/D/ST5/01654]
  2. Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyzszego [STRATEGMED1/235773/19/NCBR/2016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nowadays gene manipulation techniques (DNA therapy) undergo progressive development and become widely used in industry and medicine. Since new advances in mRNA technologies are capable for obtaining particles with increased stability and translational efficiency, RNA become an attractive alternative for advancement of DNA therapy. For the past years studies have been conducted to explore different modification in mRNA cap structure and its effect on RNA properties. Recently we have shown that modification of the cap structure at the N2 position of 7-methylguanosine leads to an enhancement in translation inhibition. Currently, we have decided to exploit translational properties of mRNA capped with the ARCA (anti-reversed cap) analogs modified within N2 position of purine moiety s. We designed and synthesized three new dinucleotide cap analogs and investigated them in the rabbit reticulocyte lysate (RRL) and the human embryonic kidney derived HEK293 cell line, in vitro translational model systems. The obtained data indicate that, in both translational assays, the cap analogs synthesized by us when incorporated into mRNA improved its translational properties compared to the ARCA capped transcripts. Furthermore, the introduced modifications enhanced stability of the capped transcripts in HEK293 cells, which become higher compared to that of the transcripts capped with regular cap or with ARCA. Additionally one of the synthesized cap analogs revealed strong translation inhibition potency in RRL system, with IC50 value 1.7 mu M.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据