4.5 Article

Preclinical characterization of anlotinib, a highly potent and selective vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 inhibitor

期刊

CANCER SCIENCE
卷 109, 期 4, 页码 1207-1219

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cas.13536

关键词

angiogenesis; anlotinib; tyrosine kinase inhibitor; VEGF; VEGFR2

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81273546]
  2. Shanghai Science and Technology Committee [14DZ2294100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Abrogating tumor angiogenesis by inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR2) has been established as a therapeutic strategy for treating cancer. However, because of their low selectivity, most small molecule inhibitors of VEGFR2 tyrosine kinase show unexpected adverse effects and limited anticancer efficacy. In the present study, we detailed the pharmacological properties of anlotinib, a highly potent and selective VEGFR2 inhibitor, in preclinical models. Anlotinib occupied the ATP-binding pocket of VEGFR2 tyrosine kinase and showed high selectivity and inhibitory potency (IC50 <1nmol/L) for VEGFR2 relative to other tyrosine kinases. Concordant with this activity, anlotinib inhibited VEGF-induced signaling and cell proliferation in HUVEC with picomolar IC50 values. However, micromolar concentrations of anlotinib were required to inhibit tumor cell proliferation directly invitro. Anlotinib significantly inhibited HUVEC migration and tube formation; it also inhibited microvessel growth from explants of rat aorta invitro and decreased vascular density in tumor tissue invivo. Compared with the well-known tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib, once-daily oral dose of anlotinib showed broader and stronger invivo antitumor efficacy and, in some models, caused tumor regression in nude mice. Collectively, these results indicate that anlotinib is a well-tolerated, orally active VEGFR2 inhibitor that targets angiogenesis in tumor growth, and support ongoing clinical evaluation of anlotinib for a variety of malignancies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据