4.7 Article

FOXQ1/NDRG1 axis exacerbates hepatocellular carcinoma initiation via enhancing crosstalk between fibroblasts and tumor cells

期刊

CANCER LETTERS
卷 417, 期 -, 页码 21-34

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.12.021

关键词

Hepatocellular carcinoma; Cancer associated fibroblast; Initiation; Forkhead box Q1; N-myc downstream-regulated gene 1

类别

资金

  1. 973 State Key Basic Research Program of China [2014CB542101, 2013CB910500]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC1308604]
  3. China National Key Projects for Infectious Disease [2012ZX10002-012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cancer associated fibroblast (CAF) is a well-known microenvironment contributor for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), while forkhead box (FOX) proteins are also critical to exacerbate HCC malignancy. However, whether FOX proteins are involved in the crosstalk between CAFs and HCC cells remains unclear. In the present study, we reveal that CAF5 induce forkhead box Q1 (FOXQ1) expression, and N-myc downstream-regulated gene 1 (NDRG1) is therefore trans-activated to enhance HCC initiation, Intriguingly, pSTAT6/C-C motif chemokine ligand 26 (CCL26) signaling is induced by FOXQ1/NDRG1 axis, thus recruiting hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), the main cellular source of CAFs, to the tumor micro environment. Thereby, tumor initiating properties are enhanced at least partly through a positive feedback loop between CAFs and HCC cells. Importantly, leflunomide, a pSTAT6 inhibitor that has been approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, significantly blocks the loop and HCC progression. High expression of CAF marker, ACTA2, and induced FOXQ1/NDRG1 axis in HCC tissues predict unfavorable prognosis. Collectively, our findings uncover a positive feedback loop between CAF5 and FOXQ1/NDRG1 axis in neoplastic cells to drive HCC initiation, thus providing new potential therapeutic targets for HCC. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据