4.7 Article

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Travel for Head and Neck Cancer Treatment and the Impact of Travel Distance on Survival

期刊

CANCER
卷 124, 期 15, 页码 3181-3191

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31571

关键词

head and neck cancer; health services; quality of care; racial disparities; travel distance

类别

资金

  1. Biostatistics Shared Resource of Hollings Cancer Center at the Medical University of South Carolina [P30 CA138313]
  2. Comparative Effectiveness Data Analytics Resources (CEDAR) core, Medical University of South Carolina Office of the Provost
  3. South Carolina Clinical and Translational Research (SCTR) Institute of the Medical University of South Carolina [NCATS UL1 TR001450]
  4. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [K12CA157688, P30CA138313] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES [UL1TR001450] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Patients who travel a long distance (>= 50 miles) for cancer care have improved outcomes. However, to the authors' knowledge, the prevalence of long travel distances for treatment by patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), and the effect of travel distance on overall survival (OS), remains unknown. METHODS:The authors used the National Cancer Data base from 2004 through 2013 to identify patients with HNSCC undergoing definitive treatment. Travel distance for treatment was categorized as short (<12.5 miles), intermediate (12.5-49.9 miles), and long (50-249.9 miles). The primary outcome, OS, was evaluated using Cox shared-frailty modeling. A secondary outcome, factors associated with intermediate and long travel distances, was evaluated using multivariable hierarchical logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 118,000 patients with HNSCC, 62,753 (53.2%), 40,644 (34.4%), and 14,603 (12.4%) patients, respectively, traveled short, intermediate, and long distances for treatment. After adjusting for relevant covariates, long travel distance was associated with treatment at academic and high-volume centers. Patients of black race, of Hispanic ethnicity, with Medicaid insurance, and who were treated with nonsurgical treatment were less likely to travel long distances for treatment (P<.001). Traveling a long distance for treatment was associated with improved OS on multivariable analysis (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.89-0.96) compared with a short distance. CONCLUSIONS: Traveling a long distance for HNSCC treatment is associated with improved survival, especially for patients receiving nonsurgical management. Racial and ethnic disparities in travel for HNSCC treatment exist. As regionalization of care continues, future work should identify and address reasons for racial and ethnic disparities in travel that may prevent access to care at high-volume facilities. (C) 2018 American Cancer Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据