4.5 Article

Population structure of red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) in US waters of the western Atlantic Ocean and the northeastern Gulf of Mexico

期刊

FISHERIES RESEARCH
卷 172, 期 -, 页码 17-25

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2015.06.020

关键词

Red snapper; Lutjanus campechanus; Atlantic Ocean; Gulf of Mexico; Population structure

资金

  1. Marfin Program of the US Department of Commerce [NA10NMF4330114]
  2. Texas AgriLife [H-6703]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Population structure of adult red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) from the southeastern coast of the United States (Atlantic) and the northeastern Gulf of Mexico (Gulf) was assessed using genotypes at 16 nuclear-encoded microsatellites and mitochondrial (mt)DNA haplotypes of the NADH dehydrogenase 4 (ND4) gene. Initial tests (F-ST-based, hierarchical AMOVA) of spatial genetic homogeneity within and between regions were non-significant, consistent with a single population or stock of red snapper in the Atlantic and Gulf. Inferences derived from other statistical approaches were consistent with genetic and/or demographic differences within and between the two regions. The estimated, average, long-term migration rate between the two regions (0.27%) was well less than the 10% rate below which populations can respond independently to environmental perturbation. Comparisons of global estimates of average, long-term effective size (N-eLT) with estimates from individual sample localities indicated genetic heterogeneity within both the Atlantic and Gulf. These results paralleled those of prior genetic studies of red snapper from the Gulf. Future genetics studies and other work on red snapper in both the Atlantic and Gulf should include approaches to identify demographically independent units within each region and assess their size, patterns of connectivity, and contribution to the fishery. Monitoring global and/or local effective size also should be considered. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据