4.7 Article

Characterization of NLR-A subfamily members in miiuy croaker and comparative genomics revealed NLRX1 underwent duplication and lose in actinopterygii

期刊

FISH & SHELLFISH IMMUNOLOGY
卷 47, 期 1, 页码 397-406

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsi.2015.09.024

关键词

NLR-A; Gene duplication; Evolution analysis; Expression pattern

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31370049]
  2. Zhejiang Province Natural Science Foundation of Distinguished Young Scientists [LR14C040001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The NOD-like receptors (NLRs, nucleotide-binding domain and leucine-rich repeat containing receptors) are a recently identified family of intracellular pathogen recognition receptors in vertebrates. Several subfamilies of NLRs have been characterized in mammals and implicated in immunity and apoptosis, but studies of NLRs in teleost species have been lacking. Here we analyzed three NLR-A subfamily members from miiuy croaker: NLRC3, NLRC5, and NLRX1. Structural analysis showed that miiuy croaker NLR-A subfamily members own the feature of 5'UTR intron which may influence their role in enhancing translation level. Comparative analysis revealed NLRX1 duplicated into NLRX1a and NLRX1b, then NLRX1a was lost in actinopterygii and NLRX1b formed NLRX1 that now we called. Simultaneously, molecular evolutionary analysis indicated that the ancestral lineages of NLRX1 in tetrapod and actinopterygii under positive selection pressure. The positively sites in actinopterygii are mainly located in NACHT domain which was the critical region for signal transduction, suggesting that the evolution of NLRX1 gene in the ancestor of actinopterygii is beneficial in immune response. Pathogens challenge demonstrated that the expressions of NLRC3 and NLRC5 in miiuy croaker were induced not only by Vibrio anguillarum but also by poly (I:C), whereas NLRX1 exhibited more sensitive response to bacteria than virus. (c) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据