4.4 Article

Cardiac protein expression patterns are associated with distinct inborn exercise capacity in non-selectively bred rats

出版社

ASSOC BRAS DIVULG CIENTIFICA
DOI: 10.1590/1414-431X20177033

关键词

Inborn aerobic capacity; Proteomics; 2-DE; MS; Heart proteins

资金

  1. Casadinho/Procad (CNPq) [552623/2011]
  2. Fundacao de Amparo e Pesquisa do Espirito Santo (FAPES) [54687950/2011]
  3. PRONEX (CNPq/FAPES) [012/2009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, we successfully demonstrated for the first time the existence of cardiac proteomic differences between non-selectively bred rats with distinct intrinsic exercise capacities. A proteomic approach based on two-dimensional gel electrophoresis coupled to mass spectrometry was used to study the left ventricle (LV) tissue proteome of rats with distinct intrinsic exercise capacity. Low running performance (LRP) and high running performance (HRP) rats were categorized by a treadmill exercise test, according to distance run to exhaustion. The running capacity of HRPs was 3.5-fold greater than LRPs. Protein profiling revealed 29 differences between HRP and LRP rats (15 proteins were identified). We detected alterations in components involved in metabolism, antioxidant and stress response, microfibrillar and cytoskeletal proteins. Contractile proteins were upregulated in the LVs of HRP rats (alpha-myosin heavy chain-6, myosin light chain-1 and creatine kinase), whereas the LVs of LRP rats exhibited upregulation in proteins associated with stress response (aldehyde dehydrogenase 2, alpha-crystallin B chain and HSP beta-2). In addition, the cytoskeletal proteins desmin and alpha-actin were upregulated in LRPs. Taken together, our results suggest that the increased contractile protein levels in HRP rats partly accounted for their improved exercise capacity, and that proteins considered risk factors to the development of cardiovascular disease were expressed in higher amounts in LRP animals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据